Why don't we change the rules for voting? Can we have a "jury" winner and a
"popular" winner?

I think that the winning entries should be chosen by a jury of 12 people,
formed by 6 permanent judges, and the 6 winners of the previous round (or
perhaps 6 - 3 permanent, and 3 winners of the previous round). What do you
think? Is that feasible?

The "popular" jury would be the present mode of voting.

BTW, I vote for Gilles Tran, Jaime Vives, Txemi Jendrix and Jim Charter for
the permanent board. :-)

Regards,

Roberto

Post a reply to this message